Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 06:20:20 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank2367
Score98.988.170.169.5
StatusExcellentGoodDegradedDegraded
Availability100.00%99.95%100.00%99.92%
p50 latency18.7 ms31.5 ms104.8 ms118.6 ms
p95 latency32.4 ms63.8 ms193.2 ms207.0 ms
p99 latency64.9 ms157.2 ms283.4 ms225.0 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.47 blocks0.37 blocks0.51 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited0311,3510
Unsupported00180
Samples8,6408,5041,9158,614

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+10.8points

  • Latency+10.9
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +10.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+28.7points

  • Latency+28.7
  • Head freshness+0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +28.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+29.4points

  • Latency+29.4
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time