Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 06:20:20 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMEV Blocker
Rank2347
Score98.988.180.969.5
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability100.00%99.95%99.99%99.92%
p50 latency18.7 ms31.5 ms87.1 ms118.6 ms
p95 latency32.4 ms63.8 ms99.7 ms207.0 ms
p99 latency64.9 ms157.2 ms129.6 ms225.0 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.47 blocks0.37 blocks0.35 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited03100
Unsupported0000
Samples8,6408,5048,5218,614

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+10.8points

  • Latency+10.9
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +10.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+17.9points

  • Latency+18.1
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +17.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+29.4points

  • Latency+29.4
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time