Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 11:56:43 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPCMEV Blocker
Rank1237
Score99.499.190.476.9
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentGood
Availability99.97%99.97%99.91%99.93%
p50 latency19.4 ms19.1 ms34.3 ms120.5 ms
p95 latency35.1 ms36.5 ms72.7 ms210.9 ms
p99 latency105.0 ms82.1 ms174.0 ms233.1 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.49 blocks0.38 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited001643
Unsupported0000
Samples38,75339,11338,16538,726

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+0.3points

  • Latency+0.3
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +0.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+9.0points

  • Latency+9.1
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +9.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+22.5points

  • Latency+22.6
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +22.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time