Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 05:00:49 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPCMEV Blocker
Rank1237
Score99.499.490.576.8
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentGood
Availability100.00%99.99%99.97%99.93%
p50 latency18.5 ms17.5 ms32.2 ms118.3 ms
p95 latency32.2 ms32.3 ms67.6 ms207.8 ms
p99 latency63.8 ms62.5 ms161.5 ms226.4 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.49 blocks0.37 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited00301
Unsupported0000
Samples8,1078,1987,9878,088

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+0.0points

  • Latency+0.0
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +0.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+8.9points

  • Latency+9.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+22.7points

  • Latency+22.7
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +22.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time