Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.6 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 11:57:46 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMEV Blocker
Rank2347
Score95.692.487.977.7
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.96%99.93%99.82%99.89%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.8 ms87.4 ms118.7 ms
p95 latency56.3 ms72.1 ms100.1 ms209.4 ms
p99 latency796.9 ms168.6 ms125.8 ms232.8 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%99.99%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.35 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited062903
Unsupported0000
Samples102,553100,872100,829102,370

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+3.2points

  • Latency+3.4
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +3.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+7.8points

  • Latency+7.9
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +7.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+17.9points

  • Latency+18.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +17.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time