Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 02:57:02 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeReal1RPC
Rank2348
Score99.191.186.658.5
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.92%100.00%75.73%
p50 latency19.7 ms34.0 ms87.2 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency36.5 ms69.5 ms100.0 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency206.3 ms171.5 ms124.7 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%96.63%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.38 blocks0.34 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited013006,653
Unsupported0000
Samples38,79438,19038,1547,977

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+8.0points

  • Latency+8.1
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +8.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+12.5points

  • Latency+12.7
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +12.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+40.6points

  • Latency+29.7
  • Availability+9.7
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +40.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time