Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.6 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 10:49:16 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlydRPCNodeReal
Rank1234
Score99.495.492.587.9
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentGood
Availability99.97%99.96%99.93%99.82%
p50 latency18.5 ms19.8 ms33.8 ms87.4 ms
p95 latency33.7 ms57.5 ms72.0 ms100.1 ms
p99 latency71.3 ms805.7 ms167.9 ms125.7 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%99.99%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.35 blocks
Rate limited006250
Unsupported0000
Samples101,473100,69699,05099,022

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+3.9points

  • Latency+3.9
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +3.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsdRPC

+6.9points

  • Latency+7.0
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +6.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsNodeReal

+11.5points

  • Latency+11.6
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +11.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time