Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 13:05:57 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPCNodeReal
Rank1234
Score99.496.587.882.7
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.94%99.98%99.94%100.00%
p50 latency20.0 ms23.4 ms33.5 ms87.8 ms
p95 latency35.0 ms45.3 ms74.5 ms99.6 ms
p99 latency103.3 ms116.3 ms177.9 ms123.9 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.49 blocks0.35 blocks0.34 blocks
Rate limited00400
Unsupported0000
Samples8,2738,3378,1328,120

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+2.9points

  • Latency+2.8
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +2.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+11.6points

  • Latency+11.7
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +11.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+16.7points

  • Latency+16.9
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +16.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time