Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

1h window · 60 minutes observed · generated 2026-08-27 12:04:34 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPCMerkle
Rank1236
Score99.495.785.169.9
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability100.00%99.94%99.94%100.00%
p50 latency20.9 ms23.9 ms34.6 ms112.4 ms
p95 latency33.8 ms47.4 ms87.6 ms209.2 ms
p99 latency55.3 ms95.7 ms190.8 ms407.4 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.47 blocks0.51 blocks0.39 blocks0.38 blocks
Rate limited005248
Unsupported0001
Samples1,6081,6241,577349

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+3.7points

  • Latency+3.6
  • Head freshness+0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +3.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+14.3points

  • Latency+14.4
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +14.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+29.5points

  • Latency+29.6
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time