Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.9 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 18:59:19 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlydRPCMerkle
Rank1236
Score99.496.992.078.4
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentGood
Availability99.98%99.96%99.94%99.98%
p50 latency19.3 ms19.8 ms33.9 ms106.9 ms
p95 latency35.6 ms49.6 ms71.9 ms195.7 ms
p99 latency76.2 ms730.9 ms170.6 ms242.9 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.48 blocks
Rate limited0066018,280
Unsupported000223
Samples114,834113,952112,07526,401

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+2.5points

  • Latency+2.5
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +2.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsdRPC

+7.4points

  • Latency+7.5
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +7.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMerkle

+21.0points

  • Latency+21.0
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time