Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 17:54:11 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPCMerkle
Rank1236
Score99.498.291.278.0
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentGood
Availability99.98%99.97%99.94%100.00%
p50 latency19.3 ms20.4 ms33.8 ms107.3 ms
p95 latency34.0 ms40.2 ms70.1 ms193.8 ms
p99 latency75.6 ms96.1 ms171.7 ms235.0 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.49 blocks0.37 blocks0.52 blocks
Rate limited001366,107
Unsupported00075
Samples38,68339,05738,0858,824

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+1.2points

  • Latency+1.2
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +1.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+8.3points

  • Latency+8.4
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+21.4points

  • Latency+21.4
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time