Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 22:56:49 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | dRPC | Blast API |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Score | 99.4 | 88.7 | 78.3 |
| Status | Excellent | Good | Good |
| Availability | 100.00% | 99.99% | 99.92% |
| p50 latency | 18.9 ms | 34.1 ms | 107.4 ms |
| p95 latency | 32.4 ms | 69.5 ms | 125.1 ms |
| p99 latency | 55.1 ms | 190.6 ms | 152.8 ms |
| Correctness | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 0.47 blocks | 0.35 blocks | 0.41 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 19 | 44 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 9,637 | 9,490 | 9,628 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsdRPC
+10.8points
- Latency+10.9
- Head freshness−0.1
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +10.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsBlast API
+21.1points
- Latency+21.2
- Head freshness−0.1
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +21.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.