Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 12:27:08 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMEV Blocker
Rank1347
Score99.490.386.476.8
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.97%99.91%100.00%99.93%
p50 latency19.4 ms34.2 ms87.3 ms120.6 ms
p95 latency34.8 ms73.2 ms100.1 ms211.2 ms
p99 latency95.3 ms173.1 ms128.4 ms233.4 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.38 blocks0.34 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited016303
Unsupported0000
Samples37,96037,37437,35437,930

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+9.1points

  • Latency+9.2
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +9.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+13.0points

  • Latency+13.2
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +13.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+22.6points

  • Latency+22.7
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +22.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time