Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 17:36:09 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCBlast API1RPC
Rank1358
Score99.491.183.957.8
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.94%99.99%73.97%
p50 latency19.3 ms33.8 ms106.1 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency34.0 ms70.1 ms122.7 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency75.8 ms171.0 ms149.8 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%100.00%96.63%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.37 blocks0.42 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited01363236,563
Unsupported0000
Samples38,19437,60038,0717,880

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+8.3points

  • Latency+8.4
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+15.5points

  • Latency+15.6
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +15.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+41.6points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+10.4
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +41.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time