Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 11:33:26 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPC1RPC
Rank1238
Score99.499.190.458.2
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentDegraded
Availability99.97%99.97%99.91%74.93%
p50 latency19.4 ms19.0 ms34.2 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency35.1 ms36.3 ms72.5 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency105.6 ms81.5 ms172.8 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%99.99%96.63%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.49 blocks0.38 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited001636,534
Unsupported0000
Samples38,12438,48037,5467,844

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+0.3points

  • Latency+0.3
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +0.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+8.9points

  • Latency+9.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+41.2points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+10.0
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +41.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time