Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.1 days observed · generated 2026-08-26 22:25:03 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyBlast APIMerkle1RPC
Rank3568
Score91.285.878.763.8
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.98%99.98%88.36%
p50 latency20.0 ms104.7 ms106.7 ms189.3 ms
p95 latency84.8 ms122.6 ms196.4 ms2922.0 ms
p99 latency914.7 ms145.1 ms244.4 ms6561.8 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%97.72%
Head lag0.51 blocks0.42 blocks0.47 blocks0.90 blocks
Rate limited091513,00713,850
Unsupported001590
Samples80,64180,12218,74116,916

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+5.4points

  • Latency+5.5
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +5.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+12.6points

  • Latency+12.6
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +12.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+27.4points

  • Latency+21.9
  • Availability+4.6
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.4

The parts add to +27.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time