Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.9 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 17:06:08 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank2367
Score96.592.278.577.5
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.96%99.93%99.98%99.89%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.9 ms106.8 ms119.1 ms
p95 latency51.5 ms71.7 ms195.6 ms210.1 ms
p99 latency749.7 ms169.2 ms243.3 ms233.8 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%99.99%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.48 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited065017,8113
Unsupported002190
Samples110,888109,05825,691110,683

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+4.3points

  • Latency+4.5
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +4.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+18.1points

  • Latency+18.1
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +18.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+19.0points

  • Latency+19.1
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +19.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time