Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

1h window · 60 minutes observed · generated 2026-08-27 12:29:48 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricdRPCMerkle1RPC
Rank369
Score84.670.50.0
StatusGoodDegradedPoor
Availability99.94%100.00%0.00%
p50 latency33.9 ms112.0 ms0.0 ms
p95 latency90.2 ms204.6 ms0.0 ms
p99 latency193.6 ms217.6 ms0.0 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%not measured
Head lag0.38 blocks0.20 blocksno cohort
Rate limited9253273
Unsupported020
Samples1,587368315

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against dRPC, the highest scorer of those selected.

dRPCvsMerkle

+14.2points

  • Latency+14.4
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +14.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

dRPCvs1RPC

+84.6points

  • Availability+40.0
  • Correctness*+20.0
  • Latency*+15.1
  • Head freshness*+9.5

The parts add to +84.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time