Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 15:41:19 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank1367
Score99.489.070.669.5
StatusExcellentGoodDegradedDegraded
Availability99.98%99.96%100.00%99.89%
p50 latency20.3 ms34.3 ms110.1 ms124.5 ms
p95 latency33.8 ms70.8 ms197.2 ms216.6 ms
p99 latency63.6 ms184.6 ms290.6 ms242.3 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.36 blocks0.45 blocks0.39 blocks
Rate limited0301,4710
Unsupported00160
Samples9,2319,0612,1539,199

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+10.5points

  • Latency+10.6
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +10.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+28.9points

  • Latency+28.9
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +28.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+29.9points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time