Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 12:30:02 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMerkle
Rank1346
Score99.490.386.477.8
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.97%99.91%100.00%100.00%
p50 latency19.4 ms34.2 ms87.3 ms107.0 ms
p95 latency34.8 ms73.1 ms100.1 ms194.6 ms
p99 latency94.8 ms173.0 ms128.3 ms235.0 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.38 blocks0.34 blocks0.50 blocks
Rate limited016306,065
Unsupported00071
Samples38,04037,44837,4348,707

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+9.0points

  • Latency+9.2
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +9.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+13.0points

  • Latency+13.2
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +13.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+21.6points

  • Latency+21.6
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time