Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 19:09:07 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPCMerkle
Rank1236
Score99.497.990.977.9
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentGood
Availability99.98%99.99%99.93%100.00%
p50 latency19.2 ms20.8 ms33.6 ms107.6 ms
p95 latency33.1 ms40.7 ms70.9 ms194.3 ms
p99 latency75.5 ms100.0 ms175.8 ms235.5 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.48 blocks0.37 blocks0.53 blocks
Rate limited001335,923
Unsupported00072
Samples37,47437,83636,8988,607

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+1.5points

  • Latency+1.5
  • Availability0.0
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +1.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+8.5points

  • Latency+8.6
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+21.5points

  • Latency+21.5
  • Head freshness+0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time