Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 00:47:05 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyBlast APIMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank1567
Score99.484.177.977.0
StatusExcellentGoodGoodGood
Availability99.99%100.00%100.00%99.96%
p50 latency19.0 ms105.9 ms107.6 ms119.1 ms
p95 latency35.0 ms121.2 ms196.0 ms211.5 ms
p99 latency69.3 ms139.7 ms230.7 ms234.4 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.42 blocks0.50 blocks0.41 blocks
Rate limited0971,4452
Unsupported00160
Samples9,3409,2292,0779,358

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+15.3points

  • Latency+15.4
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +15.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+21.5points

  • Latency+21.5
  • Availability0.0
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +21.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+22.4points

  • Latency+22.5
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +22.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time