Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.4 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 06:53:52 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeMerkleMEV BlockerCloudflare
Rank1679
Score99.478.877.955.4
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.97%99.98%99.89%23.10%
p50 latency18.2 ms106.5 ms118.4 ms15.0 ms
p95 latency33.5 ms195.5 ms209.2 ms87.4 ms
p99 latency69.5 ms243.2 ms232.7 ms252.9 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.47 blocks0.40 blocksno cohort
Rate limited015,156277
Unsupported018302,773
Samples95,06821,79094,18394,162

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsMerkle

+20.6points

  • Latency+20.6
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Correctness0.0
  • Availability0.0

The parts add to +20.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMEV Blocker

+21.5points

  • Latency+21.6
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +21.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsCloudflare

+44.0points

  • Availability+29.7
  • Head freshness*+9.4
  • Latency+7.1
  • Correctness2.2

The parts add to +44.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time