Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-26 19:38:50 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyNodeRealMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank2467
Score98.286.678.177.2
StatusExcellentGoodGoodGood
Availability99.96%100.00%100.00%99.86%
p50 latency20.0 ms87.4 ms106.6 ms118.7 ms
p95 latency39.4 ms100.1 ms195.5 ms210.0 ms
p99 latency399.3 ms123.7 ms241.2 ms232.6 ms
Correctness99.98%100.00%100.00%99.99%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.35 blocks0.44 blocks0.39 blocks
Rate limited006,1650
Unsupported00790
Samples38,36937,6758,91438,249

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+11.6points

  • Latency+11.8
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +11.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+20.1points

  • Latency+20.2
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +20.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+21.0points

  • Latency+21.1
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time