Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 44 hours observed · generated 2026-08-26 16:25:08 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricdRPCMerkleMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank2678
Score93.578.477.564.0
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.94%99.97%99.87%88.84%
p50 latency33.8 ms106.5 ms118.1 ms189.3 ms
p95 latency72.0 ms196.8 ms208.7 ms2922.0 ms
p99 latency166.5 ms245.4 ms232.9 ms6561.8 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%99.98%97.72%
Head lag0.35 blocks0.47 blocks0.39 blocks0.90 blocks
Rate limited50311,499012,179
Unsupported014000
Samples69,72716,55870,76514,999

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against dRPC, the highest scorer of those selected.

dRPCvsMerkle

+15.1points

  • Latency+15.0
  • Head freshness+0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +15.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

dRPCvsMEV Blocker

+16.0points

  • Latency+15.9
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +16.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

dRPCvs1RPC

+29.5points

  • Latency+24.0
  • Availability+4.4
  • Head freshness+0.6
  • Correctness+0.5

The parts add to +29.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time