Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 47 hours observed · generated 2026-08-26 19:11:14 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricMerkleMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank678
Score78.477.464.0
StatusGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.97%99.87%88.84%
p50 latency106.6 ms118.4 ms189.3 ms
p95 latency196.1 ms209.2 ms2922.0 ms
p99 latency244.4 ms233.3 ms6561.8 ms
Correctness100.00%99.98%97.72%
Head lag0.46 blocks0.39 blocks0.90 blocks
Rate limited12,211012,955
Unsupported14900
Samples17,58175,25215,886

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Merkle, the highest scorer of those selected.

MerklevsMEV Blocker

+0.9points

  • Latency+1.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +0.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Merklevs1RPC

+14.3points

  • Latency+8.9
  • Availability+4.5
  • Head freshness+0.5
  • Correctness+0.5

The parts add to +14.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time