Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 42 hours observed · generated 2026-08-26 14:59:05 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeMerkleMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank1678
Score99.478.477.664.0
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.97%99.87%88.84%
p50 latency18.3 ms106.3 ms118.0 ms189.3 ms
p95 latency32.0 ms196.9 ms208.6 ms2922.0 ms
p99 latency67.9 ms245.5 ms233.1 ms6561.8 ms
Correctness99.98%100.00%99.98%97.72%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.47 blocks0.40 blocks0.90 blocks
Rate limited011,120011,777
Unsupported013700
Samples69,07116,02768,44514,538

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsMerkle

+21.0points

  • Latency+21.0
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Correctness0.0
  • Availability+0.0

The parts add to +21.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMEV Blocker

+21.8points

  • Latency+21.9
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +21.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevs1RPC

+35.4points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+4.5
  • Head freshness+0.5
  • Correctness+0.5

The parts add to +35.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time