Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 09:52:45 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank2367
Score99.388.070.169.5
StatusExcellentGoodDegradedDegraded
Availability99.95%99.94%100.00%99.92%
p50 latency18.9 ms31.7 ms105.1 ms119.8 ms
p95 latency33.6 ms66.9 ms194.3 ms208.7 ms
p99 latency122.9 ms159.9 ms228.8 ms226.2 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.35 blocks0.60 blocks0.42 blocks
Rate limited0401,5081
Unsupported00180
Samples9,5139,3592,1979,507

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+11.3points

  • Latency+11.5
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +11.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+29.2points

  • Latency+29.1
  • Head freshness+0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+29.8points

  • Latency+29.9
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time