Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-26 20:19:00 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyNodeRealMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank1467
Score99.482.370.769.5
StatusExcellentGoodDegradedDegraded
Availability99.99%100.00%100.00%99.90%
p50 latency19.8 ms87.2 ms109.5 ms123.8 ms
p95 latency36.0 ms99.5 ms193.6 ms214.5 ms
p99 latency74.0 ms125.6 ms234.4 ms237.1 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.51 blocks0.34 blocks0.40 blocks0.39 blocks
Rate limited001,3490
Unsupported00150
Samples8,6018,4471,9388,601

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+17.1points

  • Latency+17.3
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +17.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+28.7points

  • Latency+28.8
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +28.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+29.9points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time