Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 15:27:39 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMerkle
Rank1346
Score99.490.786.577.9
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.98%99.93%100.00%100.00%
p50 latency19.2 ms33.9 ms87.3 ms107.1 ms
p95 latency34.1 ms71.6 ms100.1 ms193.2 ms
p99 latency76.3 ms173.5 ms129.8 ms234.1 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.37 blocks0.34 blocks0.48 blocks
Rate limited014406,006
Unsupported00073
Samples37,96437,37937,3838,678

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+8.7points

  • Latency+8.8
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+12.9points

  • Latency+13.1
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +12.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+21.5points

  • Latency+21.5
  • Availability0.0
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +21.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time