Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.8 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 16:47:28 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyNodeRealMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank2467
Score96.587.678.477.6
StatusExcellentGoodGoodGood
Availability99.96%99.83%99.98%99.89%
p50 latency19.8 ms87.4 ms106.8 ms119.1 ms
p95 latency51.4 ms100.0 ms195.8 ms210.1 ms
p99 latency752.9 ms126.2 ms243.4 ms233.8 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%99.99%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.35 blocks0.48 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited0017,7373
Unsupported002190
Samples110,387108,52125,572110,178

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+8.9points

  • Latency+9.0
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +8.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+18.1points

  • Latency+18.1
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +18.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+19.0points

  • Latency+19.1
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +19.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time