Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 08:36:11 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodeNodeRealMerkle
Rank1246
Score99.499.486.477.9
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.97%99.98%100.00%100.00%
p50 latency19.4 ms18.4 ms87.2 ms107.2 ms
p95 latency35.3 ms35.4 ms100.2 ms193.5 ms
p99 latency127.2 ms74.2 ms128.7 ms240.0 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.48 blocks0.34 blocks0.50 blocks
Rate limited0006,101
Unsupported00073
Samples38,19738,54137,6258,734

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+0.0points

  • Latency+0.0
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Correctness0.0
  • Availability0.0

The parts add to +0.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+13.0points

  • Latency+13.2
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +13.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+21.5points

  • Latency+21.5
  • Availability0.0
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time