Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 14:56:35 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodeNodeRealMerkle
Rank1246
Score99.495.582.970.8
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.95%99.98%100.00%100.00%
p50 latency20.1 ms24.7 ms87.7 ms108.2 ms
p95 latency34.5 ms48.9 ms99.4 ms191.4 ms
p99 latency77.6 ms118.6 ms126.6 ms231.3 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.50 blocks0.33 blocks0.46 blocks
Rate limited0001,498
Unsupported00018
Samples9,6419,7149,4612,235

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+3.9points

  • Latency+3.9
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +3.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+16.5points

  • Latency+16.7
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +16.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+28.6points

  • Latency+28.6
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +28.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time