Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.1 days observed · generated 2026-08-26 23:50:15 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyMerkleMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank3678
Score92.178.977.963.8
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.98%99.88%88.36%
p50 latency20.0 ms106.7 ms118.5 ms189.3 ms
p95 latency80.2 ms196.2 ms209.4 ms2922.0 ms
p99 latency899.5 ms243.2 ms233.5 ms6561.8 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%99.99%97.72%
Head lag0.51 blocks0.46 blocks0.40 blocks0.90 blocks
Rate limited013,366114,248
Unsupported016100
Samples82,92919,24982,77417,368

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+13.2points

  • Latency+13.3
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +13.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+14.2points

  • Latency+14.3
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +14.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+28.3points

  • Latency+22.8
  • Availability+4.6
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.4

The parts add to +28.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time