Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 15:42:44 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCMerkle1RPC
Rank1368
Score99.490.777.957.8
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.93%100.00%73.97%
p50 latency19.2 ms33.9 ms107.1 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency34.1 ms71.5 ms193.3 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency76.0 ms173.3 ms234.4 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%100.00%96.63%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.37 blocks0.48 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited01446,0946,589
Unsupported00740
Samples38,36937,7768,7817,912

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+8.7points

  • Latency+8.8
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+21.5points

  • Latency+21.5
  • Availability0.0
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +21.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+41.6points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+10.4
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +41.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time