Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 01:54:23 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyMerkleMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank2678
Score99.078.077.158.5
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%100.00%99.89%75.73%
p50 latency19.8 ms107.0 ms119.2 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency36.8 ms195.2 ms210.7 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency217.6 ms239.8 ms233.9 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%99.99%96.63%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.46 blocks0.39 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited06,21926,642
Unsupported08200
Samples38,7258,94138,6667,965

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+21.0points

  • Latency+21.1
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+22.0points

  • Latency+22.1
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +22.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+40.6points

  • Latency+29.6
  • Availability+9.7
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +40.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time