Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.2 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 01:54:53 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyMerkleMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank3678
Score93.879.278.262.6
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.98%99.88%85.50%
p50 latency19.9 ms106.6 ms118.5 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency71.9 ms195.9 ms209.5 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency877.9 ms243.1 ms233.4 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.51 blocks0.46 blocks0.40 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited013,899214,793
Unsupported017000
Samples86,29220,01286,13018,354

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+14.6points

  • Latency+14.7
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +14.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+15.5points

  • Latency+15.6
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +15.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+31.1points

  • Latency+24.4
  • Availability+5.8
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +31.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time