Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 17:49:27 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodeBlast APIMerkle
Rank1256
Score99.494.978.370.8
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%100.00%99.99%100.00%
p50 latency20.3 ms25.5 ms109.0 ms110.7 ms
p95 latency33.4 ms50.5 ms127.6 ms191.8 ms
p99 latency64.8 ms111.8 ms154.9 ms235.0 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.48 blocks0.41 blocks0.55 blocks
Rate limited00391,494
Unsupported00020
Samples9,4469,5169,4182,207

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+4.5points

  • Latency+4.5
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0
  • Head freshness0.0

The parts add to +4.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+21.1points

  • Latency+21.2
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+28.6points

  • Latency+28.5
  • Head freshness+0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +28.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time