Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.7 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 14:19:00 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlyMerkleCloudflare
Rank1269
Score99.496.178.554.8
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.97%99.96%99.98%23.11%
p50 latency18.8 ms19.8 ms106.6 ms15.1 ms
p95 latency34.4 ms53.7 ms196.1 ms87.5 ms
p99 latency73.3 ms774.9 ms243.1 ms250.8 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.50 blocks0.48 blocksno cohort
Rate limited0017,09596
Unsupported002073,127
Samples107,197106,38124,635106,202

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+3.3points

  • Latency+3.3
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +3.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMerkle

+20.9points

  • Latency+20.9
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +20.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsCloudflare

+44.6points

  • Availability+29.7
  • Head freshness*+9.4
  • Latency+7.7
  • Correctness2.2

The parts add to +44.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time