Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.3 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 04:43:34 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlydRPCMerkle
Rank1236
Score99.494.593.278.9
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentGood
Availability99.97%99.96%99.93%99.98%
p50 latency18.2 ms19.8 ms33.9 ms106.5 ms
p95 latency33.6 ms65.3 ms72.3 ms195.9 ms
p99 latency70.0 ms853.2 ms168.7 ms244.4 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.51 blocks0.36 blocks0.47 blocks
Rate limited0057714,612
Unsupported000180
Samples91,53290,83989,33621,016

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+4.9points

  • Latency+4.9
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +4.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsdRPC

+6.2points

  • Latency+6.3
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +6.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMerkle

+20.5points

  • Latency+20.5
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Correctness0.0
  • Availability0.0

The parts add to +20.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time