Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.9 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 17:54:14 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCMerkleCloudflare
Rank2369
Score96.792.178.454.3
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.93%99.98%23.11%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.9 ms106.9 ms15.3 ms
p95 latency50.4 ms71.7 ms195.7 ms89.1 ms
p99 latency741.4 ms169.7 ms243.1 ms252.2 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.48 blocksno cohort
Rate limited065218,02596
Unsupported002203,300
Samples112,191110,34325,997112,009

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+4.6points

  • Latency+4.8
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +4.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+18.3points

  • Latency+18.3
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +18.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsCloudflare

+42.4points

  • Availability+29.7
  • Head freshness*+9.4
  • Latency+5.5
  • Correctness2.2

The parts add to +42.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time