Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 07:51:33 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyNodeRealMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank2467
Score98.680.070.069.5
StatusExcellentGoodDegradedDegraded
Availability99.99%100.00%100.00%99.93%
p50 latency18.3 ms87.4 ms104.8 ms118.8 ms
p95 latency32.0 ms104.5 ms193.7 ms207.3 ms
p99 latency70.8 ms139.6 ms268.8 ms224.7 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.47 blocks0.35 blocks0.59 blocks0.41 blocks
Rate limited001,4900
Unsupported00170
Samples9,4789,3522,1229,468

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+18.6points

  • Latency+18.7
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +18.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+28.6points

  • Latency+28.5
  • Head freshness+0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +28.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+29.1points

  • Latency+29.2
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time