Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.3 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 02:57:28 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMerkle
Rank2346
Score94.093.588.979.1
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.96%99.93%99.79%99.98%
p50 latency19.9 ms34.0 ms87.3 ms106.6 ms
p95 latency69.4 ms72.6 ms99.9 ms196.0 ms
p99 latency868.9 ms169.1 ms123.5 ms243.1 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.51 blocks0.36 blocks0.35 blocks0.46 blocks
Rate limited0569014,187
Unsupported000174
Samples87,97786,52186,46820,399

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+0.5points

  • Latency+0.6
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +0.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+5.1points

  • Latency+5.3
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +5.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+15.0points

  • Latency+15.0
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +15.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time