Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 10:06:18 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyMerkleMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank1678
Score99.477.876.858.2
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.97%100.00%99.92%74.93%
p50 latency19.4 ms106.9 ms120.2 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency35.2 ms193.5 ms210.5 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency118.8 ms236.5 ms231.9 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%100.00%96.63%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.51 blocks0.40 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited05,97136,422
Unsupported07600
Samples37,3868,55437,3717,716

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+21.6points

  • Latency+21.6
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+22.5points

  • Latency+22.6
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +22.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+41.2points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+10.0
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +41.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time