Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.8 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 14:56:49 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyMerkleMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank2678
Score96.278.577.662.4
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.98%99.89%84.99%
p50 latency19.8 ms106.7 ms118.9 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency53.0 ms195.8 ms209.8 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency769.7 ms243.3 ms233.5 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.48 blocks0.40 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited017,239318,435
Unsupported020900
Samples107,39424,857107,19222,529

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+17.7points

  • Latency+17.8
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +17.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+18.6points

  • Latency+18.7
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +18.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+33.8points

  • Latency+26.8
  • Availability+6.0
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +33.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time