Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 17:05:18 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodeNodeRealMerkle
Rank1246
Score99.495.182.970.9
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%100.00%100.00%100.00%
p50 latency20.2 ms25.5 ms87.5 ms109.9 ms
p95 latency33.5 ms50.0 ms99.6 ms191.2 ms
p99 latency65.9 ms112.8 ms130.2 ms235.5 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.49 blocks0.33 blocks0.52 blocks
Rate limited0001,302
Unsupported00019
Samples8,2538,3108,0991,923

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+4.3points

  • Latency+4.3
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0
  • Head freshness+0.0

The parts add to +4.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+16.5points

  • Latency+16.7
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +16.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+28.5points

  • Latency+28.5
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +28.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time