Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.6 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 10:13:51 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlydRPCMEV Blocker
Rank1237
Score99.495.492.677.8
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentGood
Availability99.97%99.96%99.93%99.89%
p50 latency18.4 ms19.8 ms33.8 ms118.6 ms
p95 latency33.7 ms58.1 ms72.0 ms209.3 ms
p99 latency70.9 ms810.1 ms167.7 ms232.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%99.99%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited006183
Unsupported0000
Samples100,50799,73898,10799,569

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+4.0points

  • Latency+4.0
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +4.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsdRPC

+6.8points

  • Latency+7.0
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +6.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMEV Blocker

+21.6points

  • Latency+21.7
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time