Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 16:31:21 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPCMEV Blocker
Rank1237
Score99.495.189.269.5
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.99%99.94%99.89%
p50 latency20.3 ms25.3 ms34.5 ms124.9 ms
p95 latency33.4 ms49.6 ms69.7 ms217.3 ms
p99 latency63.0 ms112.6 ms184.3 ms243.1 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.49 blocks0.36 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited00200
Unsupported0000
Samples8,9569,0318,7898,930

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+4.3points

  • Latency+4.3
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +4.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+10.2points

  • Latency+10.4
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +10.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+29.9points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +29.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time