Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
7d window · 2.4 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 06:54:33 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | dRPC | MEV Blocker |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| Score | 94.9 | 92.9 | 77.9 |
| Status | Excellent | Excellent | Good |
| Availability | 99.97% | 99.93% | 99.89% |
| p50 latency | 19.8 ms | 33.8 ms | 118.5 ms |
| p95 latency | 61.6 ms | 71.7 ms | 209.2 ms |
| p99 latency | 830.5 ms | 167.3 ms | 232.7 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 99.99% | 99.99% |
| Head lag | 0.50 blocks | 0.36 blocks | 0.40 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 591 | 2 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 94,368 | 92,810 | 94,202 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsdRPC
+2.0points
- Latency+2.1
- Head freshness−0.2
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +2.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsMEV Blocker
+17.0points
- Latency+17.1
- Head freshness−0.1
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +17.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.