Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 17:20:58 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank1367
Score99.489.571.169.5
StatusExcellentGoodDegradedDegraded
Availability99.98%99.95%100.00%99.90%
p50 latency20.2 ms34.5 ms110.0 ms125.2 ms
p95 latency33.5 ms68.4 ms188.4 ms217.5 ms
p99 latency66.3 ms177.7 ms235.5 ms244.0 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.36 blocks0.52 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited0211,3690
Unsupported00190
Samples8,6778,5172,0248,633

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+9.9points

  • Latency+10.0
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +9.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+28.3points

  • Latency+28.3
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +28.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+29.9points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +29.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time